Cool Runnings International Inc v. Gonzalez

E.D. California

Cool Runnings International Inc v. Gonzalez

DecidedJanuary 6, 2023

Docket1:21-cv-00974

StatusUnknown

This text of Cool Runnings International Inc v. Gonzalez (Cool Runnings International Inc v. Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cool Runnings International Inc v. Gonzalez, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COOL RUNNINGS INTERNATIONAL, Case No. 1:21-cv-00974-ADA-HBK INC., 12 ORDER GRANTING NOTICE OF REQUEST Plaintiff, TO SEAL 13 v. (Doc. No. 86) 14 ANDRONICO ADAN GONZALEZ, 15 ABIMAEL LUPIAN UTRERA, and DRC CONTRACTING, LLC, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s request to seal documents pursuant to Local Rule 19 141, filed on December 21, 2022. (Doc. No. 86). Defendants did not submit an opposition under 20 Local Rule 141(c). 21 Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b), Plaintiff requests the Court to seal the documents 22 identified as “Exhibit A” referend in it motion to supplement the record. (Doc. No. 86 at 1). 23 Plaintiff requests that these documents be filed and remain under seal in this Court because 24 Defendants had designated them “confidential.” (Id. at 2). Defendants in fact produced these 25 documents in discovery and have access to them. (Id. at 1-3). 26 For the reasons stated in Plaintiff’s request, primarily that Defendants marked these 27 exhibits confidential and one of the documents were unfiled with the California Secretary of 28 State, the Court finds sealing the exhibits pursuant to the protective order serves a compelling 1 | interest. See Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC., 809 F.3d 1092, (9th Cir. 2016); 2 | Kamakana vy. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179-1180 (9th Cir. 2006); Foltz v. 3 || State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003). 4 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 5 1. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request to seal documents (Doc. No. 86) identified 6 | as “Exhibit A” in motion to supplement record (Doc. No. 87). 7 2. Plaintiff shall provide an electronic copy of the document to be sealed to the Clerk 8 | of Court by email to: ApprovedSealed @ caed.uscourts.gov, at which time the Clerk of Court will 9 | file the documents under seal. See Local Rule 141(e)(2)G). 10 Dated: _ January 6, 2023 Gow Zh. Bareh Zack 12 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COOL RUNNINGS INTERNATIONAL, Case No. 1:21-cv-00974-ADA-HBK INC., 12 ORDER GRANTING NOTICE OF REQUEST Plaintiff, TO SEAL 13 v. (Doc. No. 86) 14 ANDRONICO ADAN GONZALEZ, 15 ABIMAEL LUPIAN UTRERA, and DRC CONTRACTING, LLC, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s request to seal documents pursuant to Local Rule 19 141, filed on December 21, 2022. (Doc. No. 86). Defendants did not submit an opposition under 20 Local Rule 141(c). 21 Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b), Plaintiff requests the Court to seal the documents 22 identified as “Exhibit A” referend in it motion to supplement the record. (Doc. No. 86 at 1). 23 Plaintiff requests that these documents be filed and remain under seal in this Court because 24 Defendants had designated them “confidential.” (Id. at 2). Defendants in fact produced these 25 documents in discovery and have access to them. (Id. at 1-3). 26 For the reasons stated in Plaintiff’s request, primarily that Defendants marked these 27 exhibits confidential and one of the documents were unfiled with the California Secretary of 28 State, the Court finds sealing the exhibits pursuant to the protective order serves a compelling 1 | interest. See Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC., 809 F.3d 1092, (9th Cir. 2016); 2 | Kamakana vy. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179-1180 (9th Cir. 2006); Foltz v. 3 || State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003). 4 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 5 1. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request to seal documents (Doc. No. 86) identified 6 | as “Exhibit A” in motion to supplement record (Doc. No. 87). 7 2. Plaintiff shall provide an electronic copy of the document to be sealed to the Clerk 8 | of Court by email to: ApprovedSealed @ caed.uscourts.gov, at which time the Clerk of Court will 9 | file the documents under seal. See Local Rule 141(e)(2)G). 10 Dated: _ January 6, 2023 Gow Zh. Bareh Zack 12 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Debbie Foltz, Consumer Action United Policyholders Texas Watch, Intervenors, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, April J. Ho Jim Mathis Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors, and Consumer Action United Policy-Holders Texas Watch, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Steven Becker

331 F.3d 1122 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC

809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Cool Runnings International Inc v. Gonzalez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cool-runnings-international-inc-v-gonzalez-caed-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack