Cooksey v. Roseberry
This text of 159 S.E. 741 (Cooksey v. Roseberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. An appeal to the appellate division of tlie municipal court of Atlanta from a judgment of the trial court overruling a motion for a new trial is invalid and presents no question for consideration by the appellate division where it contains no assignment of error upon the judgment overruling the motion. In the present case the appeal contained no assignment of error upon the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial, but the exceptions taken therein were only to the rulings set forth and complained of in the motion. The appellate division could not review the rulings made during the trial upon an appeal so framed. Jeter v. Turman-Brown Co., 169 Ga. 30 (149 S. E. 555) ; Holcomb v. Finch, 25 Ga. App. 261 (2) (103 S. E. 38) ; Reese v. Miller, 33 Ga. App. 442 (2) (126 S. E. 904); Branon v. Ellbee Pictures Corp., 40 Ga. App. 450 (150 S. E. 168) ; Coppedge Dry Cleaning Co. v. Levine, 41 Ga. App. 382 (2) (153 S. E. 206).
2. The superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 S.E. 741, 43 Ga. App. 626, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooksey-v-roseberry-gactapp-1931.