Cooks', Waiters' & Waitresses' Union, No. 399 v. Theoharis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Cooks', Waiters' & Waitresses' Union, No. 399 v. Theoharis

228 S.W. 984, 1921 Tex. App. LEXIS 804

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 3, 1921

DocketNo. 1218.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 228 S.W. 984 (Cooks', Waiters' & Waitresses' Union, No. 399 v. Theoharis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooks', Waiters' & Waitresses' Union, No. 399 v. Theoharis, 228 S.W. 984, 1921 Tex. App. LEXIS 804 (Tex. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

HIGGINS, J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a motion to dissolve an injunction theretofore issued. Upon the hearing evidence was offered by both sides upon the issues presented.' No briefs have been filed in this court by either side, ilo findings were filed by the trial court, and in this condition of the record it must be assumed that the court, below resolved all controverted issues of fact in favor of the appellees. Reed v. Brewer, 90 Tex. 144, 37 S. W. 418, and other cases cited in 1 Michie, Dig. 753.

An examination of the statement of facts discloses that; the evidence was conflicting upon the issues raised.

Upon the record, as presented, we find no error, for it is a fact case, the evidence conflicting, and the presumption obtaining that all controverted issues of fact were resolved against the appellants.

For this reason, the judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HIGGINS, J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a motion to dissolve an injunction theretofore issued. Upon the hearing evidence was offered by both sides upon the issues presented.' No briefs have been filed in this court by either side, ilo findings were filed by the trial court, and in this condition of the record it must be assumed that the court, below resolved all controverted issues of fact in favor of the appellees. Reed v. Brewer, 90 Tex. 144, 37 S. W. 418, and other cases cited in 1 Michie, Dig. 753.

An examination of the statement of facts discloses that; the evidence was conflicting upon the issues raised.

Upon the record, as presented, we find no error, for it is a fact case, the evidence conflicting, and the presumption obtaining that all controverted issues of fact were resolved against the appellants.

For this reason, the judgment must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 S.W. 984, 1921 Tex. App. LEXIS 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooks-waiters-waitresses-union-no-399-v-theoharis-texapp-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack