Cook's Pest Control, Inc. v. Hastings

883 So. 2d 1207, 2003 Ala. LEXIS 368, 2003 WL 22929134
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 12, 2003·No. 1021795·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

The Marshall Circuit Court denied the motion to compel arbitration filed by Cook's Pest Control, Inc. ("Cook's"), finding that the transaction did not involve interstate commerce; the court's ruling was based on our now abrogated decision inSisters of the Visitation v. Cochran Plastering Co.,775 So.2d 759 (Ala. 2000). We reverse the order denying the motion and remand the cause for consideration in light of Service Corp.International v. Fulmer, 883 So.2d 621 (Ala. 2003), and Bowenv. Security Pest Control, Inc., 879 So.2d 1139 (Ala. 2003).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BROWN and WOODALL, JJ., concur.

LYONS and JOHNSTONE, JJ., concur in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook's Pest Control, Inc. v. Hastings, 883 So. 2d 1207, 2003 Ala. LEXIS 368, 2003 WL 22929134 (Ala. 2003).

883 So. 2d 1207 (Cook's Pest Control, Inc. v. Hastings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Birmingham News Co. v. Horn
901 So. 2d 27 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2004)