Cook/Pony Farm Real Estate Inc. v. Sullivan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cook/Pony Farm Real Estate Inc. v. Sullivan

251 A.D.2d 444, 673 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6872

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D.2d 444 (Cook/Pony Farm Real Estate Inc. v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cook/Pony Farm Real Estate Inc. v. Sullivan, 251 A.D.2d 444, 673 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover a real estate broker’s commission, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), entered July 10, 1997, which, after a non-jury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $20,550.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff earned its real estate broker’s commission by procuring a buyer who was ready, willing, and able to purchase the defendants’ property in accordance with the defendants’ terms (see, Sauerhoff-Kessler Realty Corp. v Roma Shopping Plaza, 201 AD2d 477, 478; see also, Holzer v Robbins, 141 AD2d 505, 506). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover a real estate broker’s commission, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), entered July 10, 1997, which, after a non-jury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $20,550.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff earned its real estate broker’s commission by procuring a buyer who was ready, willing, and able to purchase the defendants’ property in accordance with the defendants’ terms (see, Sauerhoff-Kessler Realty Corp. v Roma Shopping Plaza, 201 AD2d 477, 478; see also, Holzer v Robbins, 141 AD2d 505, 506). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 444, 673 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cookpony-farm-real-estate-inc-v-sullivan-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack