Cookes v. Patriotic Bank

Supreme Court of Virginia

Cookes v. Patriotic Bank

1 Va. 433

DecidedOctober 15, 1829

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Va. 433 (Cookes v. Patriotic Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cookes v. Patriotic Bank, 1 Va. 433 (Va. 1829).

Pincite

Opinion

In a notice of a motion to be made on a forthcoming bond the bond is described by mistake as executed by John when it was in fact executed by George M. Cooke: held, variance material, and notice insufficient.

This court held the variance material and fatal, and reversed the judgment of the circuit court.

He was absent during the whole of' this term, being a member of the convention, (which sat from the first Monday in October 1829, till the 15th January 1830) and constantly attending his duty there.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a notice of a motion to be made on a forthcoming bond the bond is described by mistake as executed by John when it was in fact executed by George M. Cooke: held, variance material, and notice insufficient.

This court held the variance material and fatal, and reversed the judgment of the circuit court.

He was absent during the whole of' this term, being a member of the convention, (which sat from the first Monday in October 1829, till the 15th January 1830) and constantly attending his duty there.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Va. 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cookes-v-patriotic-bank-va-1829.