Cookes v. Patriotic Bank of Washington
1 Leigh 433
Opinion
The only point was the misnomer in the notice, of the principal obligor — John M. instead of George M. Cooke; the effect of which was, that the notice described a different forthcoming bond from that on which the motion was in fact made.
This court held the variance material and fatal, and reversed the judgment of the circiut court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cookes v. Patriotic Bank of Washington, 1 Leigh 433 (Va. 1829).
1 Leigh 433 (Cookes v. Patriotic Bank of Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anderson v. Prince
55 S.E. 656 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1906)
Shepherd v. Brown
3 S.E. 186 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1887)
Board of Education v. Parsons
22 W. Va. 308 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1883)