Cookery Lafayette, Inc. v. Westerly Co.
This text of 2 A.D.2d 970 (Cookery Lafayette, Inc. v. Westerly Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The lease is ambiguous concerning the relationship between the parties as to the use of the sidewalk. The true intent of the parties in that respect cannot be determined solely from the lease and other documentary evidence and there was no testimony on this point at the trial. Judgment unanimously [971]*971reversed and a new trial ordered at which proof should be adduced so that the intention of the parties may be determined, with costs to abide the event. Concur — Botein, J. P., Rabin, Frank, Valente and Bergan, JJ. [3 Misc 2d 296.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 A.D.2d 970, 157 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cookery-lafayette-inc-v-westerly-co-nyappdiv-1956.