Cooke v. United States
This text of 69 U.S. 218 (Cooke v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It does not appear that the proposition has'been accepted; and if not, the amount in controversy remains unaffected. But had the alleged reduction 'been made by an actual payment, the jurisdiction of the court would not be taken away. The jurisdictional facts existed at the time of issuing and serving the writ of error. By its issue and service the court obtained jurisdiction over the 'cause, and this jurisdiction once acquired, cannot be taken away by any change in the value of the subject of controversy.
Motion overruled and case retained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 U.S. 218, 17 L. Ed. 755, 2 Wall. 218, 1864 U.S. LEXIS 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooke-v-united-states-scotus-1864.