Cooke v. Rhine
1 S.C.L. 16
Opinions
thought that the admission of the doctrine contended for by the defendant’s counsel, might have a tendency to introduce different and very opposite issues, which might embarrass both courts and juries exceedingly; and accordingly charged the jury to reject the discount.
was of a different opinion, and thought it a very proper matter for the consideration of the jury in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cooke v. Rhine, 1 S.C.L. 16 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1784).
1 S.C.L. 16 (Cooke v. Rhine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.