Cooke v. Little

194 So. 853, 239 Ala. 319, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 301
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 14, 1940·No. 8 Div. 975.·Published

Opinion

THOMAS, Justice.

The lack of statutory authority to maintain the appeal presents to this court a question of jurisdiction.

The appeal is not from the' decree of prohibition (Code, §§ 8979, 8980), but is from an interlocutory order in the circuit court, in equity, overruling a motion to *320 vacate a restraining order. Code, § 6081; Preskitt v. Chandler, 214 Ala. 278, 107 So. 750.

*319 ANDERSON, C. J., not sitting.

*320 It results from the foregoing that the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The order attempted to be appealed from does not support the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooke v. Little, 194 So. 853, 239 Ala. 319, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 301 (Ala. 1940).

194 So. 853 (Cooke v. Little) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Preskitt v. Chandler
107 So. 750 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)