Cooke v. Leonard

The Superior Court of New York City

Cooke v. Leonard

17 Jones & S. 538

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedJune 2, 1883

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Jones & S. 538 (Cooke v. Leonard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooke v. Leonard, 17 Jones & S. 538 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

Sedgwick, Ch. J., Truax and O’Gorman, JJ., sitting. Per Curiam.—The form of the order directing the reference, the fact that a motion was made to re-settle the order, by.striking some part from it and the affidavit used on the motion to re-settle, indicate that there was no opposition to the order of reference, as such, it should therefore be affirmed. .-It was, however, no part of such an older to prescribe that defendant should produce his book, and the direction “thatdefendants produce and'submit their books of account to said referee on such accounting” should have been stricken from the order on the motion made for that purpose. Order of reference modified, as indicated above, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sedgwick, Ch. J., Truax and O’Gorman, JJ., sitting. Per Curiam.—The form of the order directing the reference, the fact that a motion was made to re-settle the order, by.striking some part from it and the affidavit used on the motion to re-settle, indicate that there was no opposition to the order of reference, as such, it should therefore be affirmed. .-It was, however, no part of such an older to prescribe that defendant should produce his book, and the direction “thatdefendants produce and'submit their books of account to said referee on such accounting” should have been stricken from the order on the motion made for that purpose. Order of reference modified, as indicated above, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Jones & S. 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooke-v-leonard-nysuperctnyc-1883.