Cooke v. Kutin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Cooke v. Kutin

1936 OK 745, 64 P.2d 693, 179 Okla. 157, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 810

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 1, 1936·No. No. 27408.·Published

Opinion

OSBORN, V. C. J.

It is conceded by the parties that the issues of law and fact in I his case are identical with the issues involved in the case of Charles B. Cooke v. John B. Kinkead et al., 179 Okla. 347, 64 P. (2d) 682, this day decided by this court, and that the opinion of the court in that case is controlling of the issues involved in this case.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

BUSBY, WELCH, PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., concur. McNEILL, C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, and GIBSON, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OSBORN, V. C. J.

It is conceded by the parties that the issues of law and fact in I his case are identical with the issues involved in the case of Charles B. Cooke v. John B. Kinkead et al., 179 Okla. 347, 64 P. (2d) 682, this day decided by this court, and that the opinion of the court in that case is controlling of the issues involved in this case.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

BUSBY, WELCH, PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., concur. McNEILL, C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, and GIBSON, JJ., dissent.

Cooke v. Kutin, 1936 OK 745, 64 P.2d 693, 179 Okla. 157, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 810 (Okla. 1936).

Pincite

1936 OK 745 (Cooke v. Kutin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related