Cooke v. Heimbinder
This text of 92 A.D.2d 604 (Cooke v. Heimbinder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action to recover the balance due for renovation work on defendants’ residence, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), entered October 1,1982, which denied their motion for leave to file a jury demand nunc pro tune. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted (see CPLR 4102, subd [e]; Lane v Marshall, 89 AD2d 579; Calspan Corp. v Fingermatrix, Inc., 84 AD2d 826; Milton A. Jacobs, Inc. v Manning Mfg. Corp., 23 Mise 2d 507). The jury demand shall be served and filed within 20 days after service upon defendants of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Thompson and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 A.D.2d 604, 459 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooke-v-heimbinder-nyappdiv-1983.