Cooke v. Flanagan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cooke v. Flanagan

52 A.D.3d 257, 857 N.Y.S.2d 908

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 5, 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 A.D.3d 257 (Cooke v. Flanagan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooke v. Flanagan, 52 A.D.3d 257, 857 N.Y.S.2d 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered March 23, 2007, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, awarding plaintiff Joseph J. Cooke the sum of $38,817.53, pursuant to an order, same court and Justice, entered March 13, 2007, which, inter alia, confirmed the report of Special Referee Howard Leventhal and denied defendants’ motion to compel disclosure and to strike the affidavit of Richard Tobin, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from the aforesaid order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

The Special Referee conducted a full accounting in accordance with the parameters set by the order of reference, and his findings are supported by the record (see Baker v Kohler, 28 AD3d 375 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 885 [2006]).

Defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Concur—Saxe, J.P, Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered March 23, 2007, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, awarding plaintiff Joseph J. Cooke the sum of $38,817.53, pursuant to an order, same court and Justice, entered March 13, 2007, which, inter alia, confirmed the report of Special Referee Howard Leventhal and denied defendants’ motion to compel disclosure and to strike the affidavit of Richard Tobin, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from the aforesaid order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

The Special Referee conducted a full accounting in accordance with the parameters set by the order of reference, and his findings are supported by the record (see Baker v Kohler, 28 AD3d 375 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 885 [2006]).

Defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Concur—Saxe, J.P, Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.3d 257, 857 N.Y.S.2d 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooke-v-flanagan-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack