Cooke v. Cooke

Supreme Court of Florida

Cooke v. Cooke

293 So. 2d 703, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4227

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 13, 1974

DocketNo. 44146

StatusPublished

This text of 293 So. 2d 703 (Cooke v. Cooke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooke v. Cooke, 293 So. 2d 703, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4227 (Fla. 1974).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S. A. (1973). Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, DEKLE and CARLTON (Retired), JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion, m which McCAIN, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S. A. (1973). Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, DEKLE and CARLTON (Retired), JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion, m which McCAIN, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 So. 2d 703, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooke-v-cooke-fla-1974.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack