Cooke v. Cooke

Supreme Court of Florida

Cooke v. Cooke

293 So. 2d 703, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4227

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 13, 1974·No. No. 44146·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S. A. (1973). Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, DEKLE and CARLTON (Retired), JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion, m which McCAIN, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S. A. (1973). Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, DEKLE and CARLTON (Retired), JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion, m which McCAIN, J., concurs.

Cooke v. Cooke, 293 So. 2d 703, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4227 (Fla. 1974).

Pincite

293 So. 2d 703 (Cooke v. Cooke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related