Cooke v. Church

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cooke v. Church

92 N.Y.S. 1120

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 92 N.Y.S. 1120 (Cooke v. Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooke v. Church, 92 N.Y.S. 1120 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order modified, so as to require the plaintiff, within 20 days from the entry of this order and notice thereof, to give to the defendant a bill of particulars setting forth the following particulars: First, the particular way or manner in which it is claimed that the defendant was careless and negligent in operating and driving an automobile, other than in. failing to sound a warning, or in driving at high and unlawful rate of speed; second, the nature and extent of the injuries sustained by plaintiff, as far as such injuries have developed, and what injuries are claimed to be permanent; third, the period or periods of time during which plaintiff claims to have been confiñed to her bed under medical care and treatment, and the extent of the liability incurred for medical attendance. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without.costs to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Order modified, so as to require the plaintiff, within 20 days from the entry of this order and notice thereof, to give to the defendant a bill of particulars setting forth the following particulars: First, the particular way or manner in which it is claimed that the defendant was careless and negligent in operating and driving an automobile, other than in. failing to sound a warning, or in driving at high and unlawful rate of speed; second, the nature and extent of the injuries sustained by plaintiff, as far as such injuries have developed, and what injuries are claimed to be permanent; third, the period or periods of time during which plaintiff claims to have been confiñed to her bed under medical care and treatment, and the extent of the liability incurred for medical attendance. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without.costs to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 N.Y.S. 1120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooke-v-church-nyappdiv-1905.