Cooke v. Burnham

32 Tex. 129
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1869·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Morrill, C. J.

Appellant sued out an injunction restraining the defendant from proceeding to enforce a judgment obtained before a justice of the peace. The petition discloses that the seiwice was had by publication in a neAvspaper fourteen days only previous to the judgment; and charges the same to be avoid. The ansAver does not deny the charge, but seeks to set up in avoidance that the plaintiff knew that the judgment had been rendered, and did not seek to restrain it within a given limit, etc. The court dismissed the injunction, from Avhieh plaintiff appealed. We conceive the court erred. Taking the facts alleged as true, the judgment Avas void, and the injunction should be perpetuated.

Eeversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooke v. Burnham, 32 Tex. 129 (Tex. 1869).

32 Tex. 129 (Cooke v. Burnham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Givens
97 S.W.2d 532 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Parker v. Watt
178 S.W. 718 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Smoot v. Judd
83 S.W. 481 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1904)
Wofford v. Booker
30 S.W. 67 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1895)
Glass v. Smith
2 S.W. 195 (Texas Supreme Court, 1886)
Thompson v. Bohannon
38 Tex. 241 (Texas Supreme Court, 1873)