Cooke v. Barker

1 Hopk. Ch. 117
New York Court of Chancery·Decided March 30, 1824·Published

Opinion

The Court.

There are only two cases in which this is done : 1st. In bills for divorce : 2d, Where, upon the defendant’s answer, some part of the fund appears to be indisputably due. But while the whole subject is in controversy, it would be prejudging the case to make such an order, and is beyond the power of the court.

Motion refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooke v. Barker, 1 Hopk. Ch. 117 (N.Y. 1824).

1 Hopk. Ch. 117 (Cooke v. Barker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.