Cooke, Teresa v. Employ Bridge/DENSO Machine & Tool Division

2018 TN WC 149
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedSeptember 19, 2018
Docket2017-03-1232
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 TN WC 149 (Cooke, Teresa v. Employ Bridge/DENSO Machine & Tool Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cooke, Teresa v. Employ Bridge/DENSO Machine & Tool Division, 2018 TN WC 149 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2018).

Opinion

FILED Sep 19, 2018 11:38 AM(ET)

TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

Ay us

Jee. Ae AGHICU PLUME eh alll

AO Dg

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT KNOXVILLE

TERESA COOKE, ) Docket No.: 2017-03-1232 Employee, )

Vv. )

EMPLOY BRIDGE/DENSO )

MACHINE AND TOOL DIVISION, ) State File No.: 16427-2015 Employer, )

and )

XL INSURANCE COMPANY, ) Carrier. ) Judge Lisa A. Lowe

COMPENSATION HEARING ORDER GRANTING BENEFITS

This matter came before the undersigned Workers’ Compensation Judge on September 4, 2018, for a Compensation Hearing.’ The issues are whether Ms. Cooke is entitled to additional temporary disability benetits, payment of unauthorized medical expenses, and whether she is limited to her original award or increased benefits. For the reasons below, the Court holds Ms. Cooke is entitled to additional temporary disability benefits, her original award of permanent partial disability benefits, and future medical care. However, Ms. Cooke failed to establish entitlement to reimbursement for unauthorized medical expenses.

History of Claim Ms. Cooke is a sixty-year-old resident of Blount County, Tennessee with a high

school diploma and some college education. The parties agreed her weekly compensation rate is $326.72.

' Ms. Cooke filed a Request for Expedited Hearing. However, since she reached maximum medical improvement, the parties requested the Court address permanent partial disability benefits. Therefore, the parties agreed to convert the Expedited Hearing to a Compensation Hearing with the caveat that the affidavits and medical records remain admissible exhibits.

1 On February 27, 2015, Ms. Cooke slipped and fell on ice in Denso’s parking lot. Employ Bridge accepted the claim as compensable. It provided a panel of physicians, and she selected Dr. David Calvert. He diagnosed head trauma, musculoskeletal pain, vertigo, and elevated blood pressure. She underwent two head CT scans, a neck CT scan, and a brain MRI, which were unremarkable. Due to continued complaints, Dr. Calvert referred Ms. Cooke for a neurology consult.

Employ Bridge provided a panel of neurologists from which Ms. Cooke selected Dr. Darel Butler. Dr. Butler assessed dizziness, visual disturbances, anxiety, and weakness. He ordered a series of diagnostic tests and conservative treatments, including a normal EMG, a head MRA revealing no abnormalities, and a neck MRA that showed right ICA stenosis and a lesion but nothing traumatic. Dr. Butler placed Ms. Cooke at maximum medical improvement (MMI) on July 9, 2015, with no permanent restrictions.

Since Dr. Butler does not provide impairment ratings, Employ Bridge authorized neurologist Dr. Jack Scariano to do so. Dr. Scariano assigned a fifteen-percent permanent impairment to the body as a whole.

Ms. Cooke also underwent evaluation with ear, nose, and throat physician Dr. Taite Seals for continued vertigo. Dr. Seals found no evidence of inner ear damage. She also saw Dr. Kirk Haun for reported double vision. Dr. Haun noted the “moving areas in vision are caused by the vestibular issues. Eyes are healthy overall . . . no treatment currently.” Ms. Cooke additionally saw Dr. Mark Widlowski for TMJ, which he advised was chronic.

Following MMI, Ms. Cooke returned to both Dr. Butler and Dr. Calvert for vertigo. Dr. Butler reiterated that he could not find a clear etiology for her vertigo. Dr. Calvert prescribed vestibular physical therapy and said she could return to full duty on July 22, 2015. He discharged her from his care on August 19. In between authorized appointments, Ms. Cooke had two emergency room visits. She claimed that on the second visit, the provider told her that she should see an orthopedist for her vestibular damage. Ms. Cooke said she asked Employ Bridge to authorize orthopedic treatment, but it denied her request. Thus, she sought treatment with her own orthopedist.’

Following her release to full duty, Denso terminated Ms. Cooke because her position was filled. She received unemployment until September 2015, when Employ Bridge found a position for her with BP Express. BP Express hired Ms. Cooke in February 2016, and she worked there until her termination for poor job performance on April 26, 2018. Ms. Cooke’s initial compensation period expired on October 24, 2016. At that time, BP Express paid her an hourly wage between $13.00 and $13.39.

* Ms. Cook did not provide copies of her unauthorized medical records and bills to the Court or Employ Bridge. Ms. Cooke argued entitlement to temporary disability benefits for February 27, 2015 (the date of injury); March 21 through March 25; and July 7 through July 9. She also asserted that she is entitled to see an orthopedist. She asked for increased permanent partial disability benefits because the injury “affected her entire life,” including her ability to earn a living. She averred she lost her job at BP Express because of her ongoing medical issues. Ms. Cooke testified that since April 2018, she has applied for over ninety jobs and only had one interview. Finally, she requested open future medical benefits.

Employ Bridge asserted that it provided all medical benefits to which Ms. Cooke was entitled. Her diagnostic tests were normal, and the authorized physician, Dr. Butler, stated there was no clear etiology for Ms. Cooke’s vertigo. None of the treating physicians indicated that she needs additional treatment. Thus, Employ Bridge argued it is not responsible for unauthorized medical expenses. Employ Bridge averred it paid Ms. Cooke all appropriate temporary disability benefits. In fact, it paid five days post-MMI, so it is entitled to a credit for $326.72 from the permanent partial disability award. Further, Ms. Cooke is limited to her original award for $22,053.60 because as of the expiration of the initial compensation period, her rate of pay was higher than at the time of injury.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

At a compensation hearing where the injured employee has arrived at a trial on the merits, the employee must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she is, in fact, entitled to the requested benefits. Panzarella v. Amazon.com, Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 30, at *10-11 (May 15, 2017); Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- 239(c)(6).

Temporary Disability Benefits

To qualify for temporary disability benefits, Ms. Cooke must establish: (1) that she became disabled from working due to a compensable injury; 2) that there is a causal connection between the injury and the inability to work; and 3) the duration of the period of disability. Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). The Workers’ Compensation Law provides that an injured worker is entitled to temporary partial disability benefits when the temporary disability is not total. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-207(1)-(2). Temporary partial disability refers to the time, if any, during which the injured employee is able to resume some gainful employment but has not reached maximum recovery. Mace v. Express Servs., Inc., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 49, at *8 (Dec. 11, 2015). “In circumstances where the treating physician has released the injured worker to return to work with restrictions prior to maximum recovery, and the employer . . . cannot return

3 the employee to work within the restrictions ..., the injured worker may be eligible for temporary partial disability.” Jones, at *8.

First, Ms.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50
Tennessee § 50
§ 50-6
Tennessee § 50-6
§ 50-6-207
Tennessee § 50-6-207(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 TN WC 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooke-teresa-v-employ-bridgedenso-machine-tool-division-tennworkcompcl-2018.