Cook v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
MICHAEL L. COOK, CASE NO. 2:20-CV-3639 Petitioner, JUDGE SARAH D. MORRISON Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson v.
WARDEN, NOBLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER
On July 24, 2020, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. (ECF No. 3.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner has waived his right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949–50 (6th Cir. 1981). Therefore, the Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Sarah D. Morrison SARAH D. MORRISON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cook v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution (Cook v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.