Cook v. Warden, Macon SP

686 F. App'x 833
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 28, 2017·No. No. 16-15311 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In 2009, De Angelo Cook, a Georgia prisoner, filed a federal habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. That petition was dismissed with prejudice as untimely, and Mr. Cook did not appeal.

In 2016, Mr. Cook filed a second habeas corpus petition. The district court dismissed this petition for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because Mr. Cook had not obtained circuit authorization to file a second or successive petition. Mr. Cook now appeals.

We affirm. Because Mr. Cook did not obtain circuit authorization to file a second or successive habeas petition, the district court did not have jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), (b) (4); Tompkins v. Secretary, 557 F.3d 1257, 1259 (11th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. Warden, Macon SP, 686 F. App'x 833 (11th Cir. 2017).

686 F. App'x 833 (Cook v. Warden, Macon SP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tompkins v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
557 F.3d 1257 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)