Cook v. Warden, Macon SP

686 F. App'x 833
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 2017
DocketNo. 16-15311 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished

This text of 686 F. App'x 833 (Cook v. Warden, Macon SP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cook v. Warden, Macon SP, 686 F. App'x 833 (11th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In 2009, De Angelo Cook, a Georgia prisoner, filed a federal habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. That petition was dismissed with prejudice as untimely, and Mr. Cook did not appeal.

In 2016, Mr. Cook filed a second habeas corpus petition. The district court dismissed this petition for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because Mr. Cook had not obtained circuit authorization to file a second or successive petition. Mr. Cook now appeals.

We affirm. Because Mr. Cook did not obtain circuit authorization to file a second or successive habeas petition, the district court did not have jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), (b) (4); Tompkins v. Secretary, 557 F.3d 1257, 1259 (11th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tompkins v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
557 F.3d 1257 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 F. App'x 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-warden-macon-sp-ca11-2017.