Cook v. Warden, London Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided August 16, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-00140·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI RICHARD COOK, : Case No. 1:22-cv-140 Petitioner, : Judge Matthew W. McFarland : Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz v. WARDEN, London Correctional : Institution, : Respondent. :

ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS, ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 16), and TERMINATING CASE

This action is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz’s Report and Recommendations (Doc. 16). This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Merz pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Magistrate Judge Merz recommends dismissing the petition with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. Petitioner objects but is unable to show that Magistrate Judge Merz’s application of the statute of limitations is erroneous. As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon such review, the Court finds that Petitioner’s objections fail to identify any error and are accordingly OVERRULED. Thus, the Court ORDERS as follows: (1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 16) in its entirety. (2) The habeas petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons stated

in the Report. (3) Petitioner is DENIED a certificate of appealability, because “jurists of reason” would not disagree with this conclusion. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484- 85 (2000). . (4) The Court CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that, for the reasons expressed in the Report, an appeal of this Order adopting the Report would be objectively frivolous, and therefore DENIES plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 611 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds, Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 203 (2007). (5) This matter is TERMINATED from the Court’s docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

oy Math wt pep JUDGE MATTHEW W. McFARLAND

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. Warden, London Correctional Institution, (S.D. Ohio 2023).

Cook v. Warden, London Correctional Institution (Cook v. Warden, London Correctional Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slack v. McDaniel
529 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Jones v. Bock
549 U.S. 199 (Supreme Court, 2007)