Cook v. United States
This text of Cook v. United States (Cook v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-5073
RICHARD P. COOK, SHIRLEY A. COOK, DEBORAH CANTRUP, KELLY ARMSTRONG and COPAR PUMICE COMPANY,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee.
Joseph E. Manges, Comeau, Maldegen, Templeman & Indall, LLP, of Santa Fe, New Mexico, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.
Matthew H. Solomson, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Mark A. Melnick, Assistant Director.
Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims
Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2009-5073
RICHARD P. COOK, SHIRLEY A. COOK, DEBORAH CANTRUP, KELLY ARMSTRONG and COPAR PUMICE COMPANY,
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States Court of Federal Claims
in CASE NO(S). 08-CV-337
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MAYER, CLEVENGER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges )
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED March 8, 2010 /s/Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cook v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-united-states-cafc-2010.