Cook v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Cook v. United States

566 F. App'x 256

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 16, 2014

DocketNo. 13-8060

StatusPublished

This text of 566 F. App'x 256 (Cook v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cook v. United States, 566 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darryl L. Cook appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cook v. United States, No. 0:13-cv-02524-RMG-PJG (D.S.C. Dec. 18, 2013). We deny the motion to place case in abeyance and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [257]*257court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darryl L. Cook appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cook v. United States, No. 0:13-cv-02524-RMG-PJG (D.S.C. Dec. 18, 2013). We deny the motion to place case in abeyance and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [257]*257court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

566 F. App'x 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-united-states-ca4-2014.