Cook v. Treasurer of the Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cook v. Treasurer of the Missouri

504 S.W.3d 96, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 810, 2016 WL 4437967

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 23, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103941

StatusPublished

This text of 504 S.W.3d 96 (Cook v. Treasurer of the Missouri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cook v. Treasurer of the Missouri, 504 S.W.3d 96, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 810, 2016 WL 4437967 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Cook appeals from the Commission’s decision denying him permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission’s decision is authorized by law and is supported by competent and substantial evidence upon the whole record. Kolar v. First Student, Inc., 470 S.W.3d 770, 774 (Mo.App. E.D. 2015). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use [97]*97only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Cook appeals from the Commission’s decision denying him permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission’s decision is authorized by law and is supported by competent and substantial evidence upon the whole record. Kolar v. First Student, Inc., 470 S.W.3d 770, 774 (Mo.App. E.D. 2015). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use [97]*97only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

504 S.W.3d 96, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 810, 2016 WL 4437967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-treasurer-of-the-missouri-moctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack