Cook v. Swanson

Fourth Circuit

Cook v. Swanson

100 F. App'x 918

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 18, 2004·No. No. 04-6271·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Terry Eugene Cook appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cook v. Swanson, No. CA-03-947-5-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 20, 2004; entered Jan. 21, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Terry Eugene Cook appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cook v. Swanson, No. CA-03-947-5-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 20, 2004; entered Jan. 21, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cook v. Swanson, 100 F. App'x 918 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

100 F. App'x 918 (Cook v. Swanson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related