Cook v. State

198 S.W.2d 270

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cook v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 152 Tex. Crim. 51 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 11, 1946·No. No. 23522·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of possessing whisky for the purpose of sale in a dry area and assessed a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented to this court for review.

The judgment of the trial court is accordingly affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing . opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of possessing whisky for the purpose of sale in a dry area and assessed a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented to this court for review.

The judgment of the trial court is accordingly affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing . opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Cook v. State, 198 S.W.2d 270 (Tex. 1946).

Pincite

198 S.W.2d 270 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.