Cook v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cook v. State

79 S.W.2d 859, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 767

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cook v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Tex. Crim. 570 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 27, 1935·No. No. 17369·Published

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

Tile offense is pandering; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for twenty-five years.

The record is" before us without a statement of facts, in the absence of which we are unable to appraise the single bill of exception brought forward.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

Tile offense is pandering; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for twenty-five years.

The record is" before us without a statement of facts, in the absence of which we are unable to appraise the single bill of exception brought forward.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Cook v. State, 79 S.W.2d 859, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 767 (Tex. 1935).

Pincite

79 S.W.2d 859 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.