Cook v. State

83 So. 2d 632, 226 Miss. 65, 1955 Miss. LEXIS 607
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cook v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 217 Miss. 788
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided December 5, 1955·No. No. 39828·Published

Opinion

Roberds, P. J.

A jury convicted appellant Cook of the murder of Lee G. Felts and fixed his punishment at life imprisonment in the state penitentiary.

Cook urges as his only contention on this appeal that the verdict of guilty was contrary to the great weight of the evidence, and that, therefore, this Court should reverse that verdict and remand the case for [66]*66trial by another jury. Cook says he shot and killed Felts in self-defense. The State says he killed Felts by shooting him in the head with a pistol at a time when Cook was in no danger, real or apparent, of suffering death or great bodily harm at the hands of Felts. The jury found for the State and the question is whether that finding is supported by the testimony.

The evidence upon some of the important facts is not in dispute. The tragedy took place at Pastime Grill located near the junction of Northside Drive with Highway 49 about, or near, the north municipal limits of the City of Jackson, Mississippi, between seven and seven thirty o’clock on the morning of June 16, 1954. The Pastime served drinks, including whiskey, and afforded a convenient and enticing place for gambling. When the shooting occurred the only persons in the Grill were Paul Littlefield, Jay Tucker, Lee G. Felts and appellant Cook. Littlefield was in charge of and operating the Grill. Tucker, Cook and Felts, in the order stated, but separately, came into the Grill at different times, from three to four o’clock in the morning. Felts, the last man to appear, had upon his person a considerable sum of money, which he was carrying in a small sack. He also had a pistol. He explained to Littlefield, in the presence of Cook and Tucker, that he had taken in the money from the operation that night of a gasoline station which he owned entirely or partly, and that he was carrying the pistol because of his possession of the money. He placed the pistol on a shelf underneath the drink counter. Apparently he also placed the sack containing the money on this same shelf.

Cook, Felts and Tucker immediately began to drink whiskey. Some of it they owned privately; some of it was purchased from the Grill. Littlefield did not engage in the drinking. But all four did engage in gambling by shooting dice. This drinking and gambling continued until around seven to seven thirty in the morning.

[67]*67We now come to the scene of the fatal shooting. We will set out in substance the testimony bearing upon the pertinent and controlling facts.

Littlefield was placed upon the stand by the State. He said all four parties came from the back room of the Grill, where they had been shooting dice, into the front room in which the serving counter was located. He was ready to close the Grill. Cook, Felts and Tucker were at, or near, the counter drinking whiskey. Cook got Felts’ pistol from the shelf under the counter. He pointed the pistol at Littlefield. Cook claimed that he and Felts and Littlefield, before the gambling started, had agreed upon a plan to fleece Tucker of his money in the dice game, and that they had succeeded in doing that to the amount of $150.00, but that he, Cook, had been paid by the other two only $23.00, and that Little-field and Felts owed him $27.00. He was using the pistol as a slight inducement to collect that $27.00 from Felts and Littlefield. He told Littlefield he wanted his money “and I want it fast”. Littlefield denied he owed Cook any money but upon looking down the barrel of the pistol he lost no time in producing from his pocket and placing upon the counter thirty dollars in bills. At this juncture Felts, who was standing close by, said to Cook “you ought not to put a pistol on anybody unless you cocked it”, and Felts also remarked “He’s too yellow to pull that trigger”; whereupon Cook grabbed Felts around the neck with his left arm, pulling his head down, and shot him in the top of the head with the pistol. There were at least two shots but one of them missed Felts and went through the left wrist of Cook as his left arm was around the neck of Felts. Little-field was not sure whether there was a third shot. Felts slumped to the floor. Witness ran across the street and informed a man by name of Baker that Cook had shot Felts. Baker called the police. As Littlefield came back to Pastime he met Cook and Tucker outside the build[68]*68ing going to Tucker’s automobile parked near the Grill. Littlefield said to Cook that he, instead of Felts, was the one who should have been shot. Cook yet had Felts’ pistol. Cook, after shooting Felts, had gathered up the thirty dollars Littlefield had placed upon the counter. Littlefield testified that Felts had no weapon of any kind and that Cook was in no danger whatever, real or apparent, of suffering great bodily harm, or death, at the hands of Felts. In other words, according to the testimony of Littlefield, Cook shot and killed Felts in cold blood.

Tucker was placed upon the witness stand by Cook. He explained the arrival of the parties, and said that ‘ ‘ shortly after Mr. Cook came in * * * we started rolling high dice”. All were gambling. He said he did not know Cook or Felts. He confirmed Littlefield’s statements that Felts placed his money bag and pistol on the shelf under the counter. In fact, he said that was done at his suggestion. Most of the gambling was in the back room. “It was rolling dice, high dice, out of a cup.” He lost money and he got Cook to cash a check for him. Coming to the front room scene, where the shooting occurred, he testified that Cook said ‘ ‘ Some s. b. owes me $25.00 and I want my money”. Felts applied the same description to Cook and then said “ * * if you are talking about me try and get it”. Littlefield said he did not owe any one any money but that Cook could have it, then while producing the bills and placing them upon the counter. At this point Cook obtained possession of Felts’ pistol. He testified that Cook “lowered the pistol, he said to Mr. Felts ‘why don’t you pay me my $25.00’, or words to that effect”. Felts replied “I told you to try and get it”. Felts further said “You have got to cock that thing before you shoot it”, and Cook said he knew how to shoot a gun. Felts then ‘ ‘ advanced on Cook” and they “grappled” and a “tussle ensued”, and Cook “brought the gun down in this manner and [69]*69fired”. Further describing what happened this witness said “they were tussling at the time the first shot was fired”. He further said “Mr. Cook was standing there with the gun in his hand, and Mr. Felts advanced on him in what we might term a belligerent manner”. Felts had no weapon of any kind. Three shots were fired by Cook. Felts did not fall until after the second shot was fired. When Felts slumped to the floor the witness said he remarked “Mr. Cook, you have done played hell”. He then said to Cook “I will bid you good day”, and started to leave. Cook still had Felts ’ pistol in his hand and said to Tucker “I am going with you”. Witness said “ * * I didn’t argue with Mr. Cook as to whether I was going with him or not”. Cook and Tucker got into Tucker’s automobile, and Cook, using Felts’ pistol, forced Tucker to drive to the Steak House on U. S. Highway 51, located near the line between Madison and Hinds Counties, Mississippi. Cook was the caretaker of the Steak House. They went into the Steak House. Cook telephoned someone and told him he had shot a man and had to have some money and apparently got permission to get it at the Steak House, which Cook did. Cook also got a rifle from the Steak House, which he said was his property.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. State, 83 So. 2d 632, 226 Miss. 65, 1955 Miss. LEXIS 607 (Mich. 1955).

83 So. 2d 632 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.