Cook v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cook v. State

147 S.E. 719, 39 Ga. App. 409, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 341

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 5, 1929

Docket19376

StatusPublished

This text of 147 S.E. 719 (Cook v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cook v. State, 147 S.E. 719, 39 Ga. App. 409, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 341 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Albert Cook and Homer Eeid were convicted of assault with intent to murder. They brought separate bills of exceptions to this court,. complaining of the overruling of their respective motions for a new trial. The same issues were raised in both motions. Therefore the case of Cook is controlled by the decision in the Reid case, supra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodiuorth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Albert Cook and Homer Eeid were convicted of assault with intent to murder. They brought separate bills of exceptions to this court,. complaining of the overruling of their respective motions for a new trial. The same issues were raised in both motions. Therefore the case of Cook is controlled by the decision in the Reid case, supra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodiuorth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 S.E. 719, 39 Ga. App. 409, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-state-gactapp-1929.