Cook v. State

691 So. 2d 42, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3151, 1997 WL 154773
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cook v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 636 So. 2d 895
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 4, 1997·No. No. 95-912·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two issues in this appeal. We affirm on the second and reverse as to the first. Hosmer v. State, 523 So.2d 184 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), holds that it is improper to impose a departure sentence upon revocation of probation without providing written reasons even if the original sentence was a valid departure sentence based on a negotiated plea. As the state properly concedes, the instant case must be remanded for resen-tencing within the original guidelines cell or a one-cell bump-up. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(14). Accordingly, we remand the cause to the trial court for resentencing.

MINER, ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. State, 691 So. 2d 42, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3151, 1997 WL 154773 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

691 So. 2d 42 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hosmer v. State
523 So. 2d 184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)