Cook v. State

619 So. 2d 505, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6473, 1993 WL 199447
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cook v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 571 So. 2d 530
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 15, 1993·No. No. 92-2118·Published

Opinion

SHIVERS, Senior Judge.

Appellant appeals his conviction, after jury trial, of aggravated battery with a deadly weapon. We affirm appellant's conviction and sentence but strike that portion of the sentencing order requiring, as a condition of probation, that he pay $200 for costs associated with his participation in the Bay County Work Program. The sentencing order' cites no statutory authority for the imposition of such costs. See Tennie v. State, 593 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Compare Smith v. State, 606 So.2d 427 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

BOOTH and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. State, 619 So. 2d 505, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6473, 1993 WL 199447 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

619 So. 2d 505 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tennie v. State
593 So. 2d 1199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Smith v. State
606 So. 2d 427 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)