Cook v. State

100 So. 196, 19 Ala. App. 666, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 103
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 1924·No. 2 Div. 283.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

There are no exceptions of merit presented by the bill of exceptions, and, no errors of a prejudicial nature appearing in the record, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

The' judgment in this.case is incomplete. In eases of misdemeanor a complete judgment must be rendered, and, when an appeal is taken under section 6244 of the Code of 1907, such judgment is suspended upon a compliance with either sections '6250 or 6251 of the Code, as the case may be.

Let the judgment of conviction be affirmed, and the cause be remanded for proper sentence.

Affirmed in part, and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. State, 100 So. 196, 19 Ala. App. 666, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 103 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

100 So. 196 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Law v. State
191 So. 803 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1939)