Cook v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Cook v. State

100 So. 196, 19 Ala. App. 666, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 103

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 20, 1924

Docket2 Div. 283.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 So. 196 (Cook v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cook v. State, 100 So. 196, 19 Ala. App. 666, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 103 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

There are no exceptions of merit presented by the bill of exceptions, and, no errors of a prejudicial nature appearing in the record, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

The' judgment in this.case is incomplete. In eases of misdemeanor a complete judgment must be rendered, and, when an appeal is taken under section 6244 of the Code of 1907, such judgment is suspended upon a compliance with either sections '6250 or 6251 of the Code, as the case may be.

Let the judgment of conviction be affirmed, and the cause be remanded for proper sentence.

Affirmed in part, and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI