Cook v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Cook v. State

85 So. 823, 17 Ala. App. 347, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 40

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 3, 1920

Docket8 Div. 696.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 85 So. 823 (Cook v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cook v. State, 85 So. 823, 17 Ala. App. 347, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 40 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

To sustain a conviction for the offense of adultery or fornication, there must he proven by the state, beyond a reasonable doubt, either hy direct evidence or hy facts and circumstances that will warrant the jury in reaching the conclusion that there has been at least one act of illicit intercourse, with an agreement between the defendants, either expressed or implied, to continue the relation whenever opportunity offered and they so desire. Brown’s Case, 108 Ala. 18, 18 South. 811.

We have examined the record in this case and the evidence utterly fails to justify a conviction, but rather indicates that the prosecution. was in retaliation for one of the defendants and her two sons having testified against one of the state’s witnesses in a' prosecution against him.

The motion for a new trial should have been granted.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI