Cook v. Snow

178 F. App'x 932

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 28, 2006·No. No. 05-15681·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully reviewed the briefs and record in this case.

The evidentiary rulings of the trial court¹ were well within discretion and do not constitute reversible error.

The trial court’s findings of fact are amply supported by the evidence and con-[933] elusions of law drawn therefrom are not erroneous.

The judgment adverse to the appellant is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully reviewed the briefs and record in this case.

The evidentiary rulings of the trial court¹ were well within discretion and do not constitute reversible error.

The trial court’s findings of fact are amply supported by the evidence and con-[933] elusions of law drawn therefrom are not erroneous.

The judgment adverse to the appellant is

AFFIRMED.

Cook v. Snow, 178 F. App'x 932 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

178 F. App'x 932 (Cook v. Snow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.