Cook v. Sheffield

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cook v. Sheffield

90 S.E. 489, 18 Ga. App. 731, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1227

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 31, 1916

Docket7390

StatusPublished

This text of 90 S.E. 489 (Cook v. Sheffield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cook v. Sheffield, 90 S.E. 489, 18 Ga. App. 731, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1227 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, O. J.

1. There is no substantial merit in any of the assignments of error as to testimony admitted by the court and the refusal by the court to grant the motions for a mistrial.

2. The case is controlled by the decision of this court in Cook v. Cook, ante, 730, and by the ruling in this case when the case was previously before this' court (Sheffield v. Cook, 17 Ga. App. 385, 87 S. E. 150), which is the law of the case, binding alike upon the trial court and upon this court. Proof was made in conformity with the previous ruling in the case, and there was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict.

3. The trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI