Cook v. Sargent

95 A. 674, 78 N.H. 25, 1915 N.H. LEXIS 8
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedOctober 5, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 A. 674 (Cook v. Sargent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cook v. Sargent, 95 A. 674, 78 N.H. 25, 1915 N.H. LEXIS 8 (N.H. 1915).

Opinion

*26 Plummer, J.

The exceptions raise no questions of law. They are based upon the claim that the trial court did not find in accordance with the weight of the evidence. The weight of the evidence is fully and finally determined by the trial court, and the findings of the court relating thereto will not be disturbed by this court. Pitman v. Mauran, 69 N. H. 230; Wilbur v. Berry, 71 N. H. 619. Furthermore, if the plaintiff desired to raise the question that the facts found by the court were not warranted by the evidence, she should have made the objection at the trial. “This objection is not transferred by the general exception- to the verdict, and was waived by the submission of the issue without raising the question by the appropriate motion.” Tilton v. Tilton, 74 N. H. 602; Farnham v. Anderson, 74 N. H. 405; Elwell v. Roper, 72 N. H. 585; Head & Dowst Co. v. Breeders’ Club, 75 N. H. 449.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred. -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bennett v. Larose
136 A. 254 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A. 674, 78 N.H. 25, 1915 N.H. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-sargent-nh-1915.