Cook v. Rockhouse Realty Co.

169 S.W. 480, 159 Ky. 710, 1914 Ky. LEXIS 878
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedSeptember 23, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 169 S.W. 480 (Cook v. Rockhouse Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cook v. Rockhouse Realty Co., 169 S.W. 480, 159 Ky. 710, 1914 Ky. LEXIS 878 (Ky. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

CHIEF JUSTICE HOBSON-

Dismissing Appeal.

The Rockhouse Realty Company brought this suit against Jacob Cook and John C. Brown charging in substance that it was the owner and entitled to the immediate possession of certain linn, poplar and walnut logs which the defendants had recently cut upon a certain tract of land which it alleged it owned. The defendants by their answer denied that the plaintiff was the owner or entitled to the possession of the logs,- or that it was the owner of the tract of land. But they did not deny the cutting of the timber from the land or set up any title to the land themselves. The case having been tried before a jury, there was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $50.00. The defendants appeal, and the plaintiff has entered a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the amount in controversy is less than $200.00; but the appellants urge that as by the answer the title of the plaintiff to the land from which the trees were cut was denied, the title to the land was put in issue, and, therefore, this court has jurisdiction of the appeal.

The precise question was decided in Ponder v. Lard, 102 Ky., 605. In that case, as here, the defendant, in the answer, though denying that the plaintiff owned the land, set up no title in him to it. The appeal was dismissed on the ground that as the defendant did not claim the land or any part of it, only the amount of money adjudged against him was in issue. This case was fol[711]*711lowed and approved in I. C. R. R. Co. v. Major, 121 S. W., 646.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Harmon
129 S.W.2d 994 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1939)
Laurel County v. Hubbard
92 S.W.2d 359 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1936)
Frazier v. Ison
240 S.W. 39 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1922)
Stafford v. Johnson
222 S.W. 929 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1920)
Lexington & Eastern Railway Co. v. Grigsby
197 S.W. 408 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1917)
Louisville Property Co. v. Whitley County Stave Co.
173 S.W. 783 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1915)
Burk Hollow Coal Co. v. Lawson
169 S.W. 695 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 S.W. 480, 159 Ky. 710, 1914 Ky. LEXIS 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-rockhouse-realty-co-kyctapp-1914.