Cook v. Robinson

96 S.E. 332, 22 Ga. App. 360, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 337
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cook v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 Ga. App. 207
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 16, 1918·No. 9130·Published

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

1. Irrespective of whether the question presented in the former bill of exceptions in this case (Cook v. Robinson, 19 Ga. App. 207, 91 S. E. 427), in which error w;as assigned also on the overruling of the defendant’s demurrer to the petition, is res judicata because of the failure of this court to expressly rule thereon, the trial court did not .err in overruling the 'demurrers to the plaintiff’s petition as amended.

2. There is no substantial merit in any of the special assignments of error in ^ the motion for a new trial.

3. The evidence sufficiently supported the verdict returned, and the trial judge did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Luke, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. Robinson, 96 S.E. 332, 22 Ga. App. 360, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 337 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

96 S.E. 332 (Cook v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cook v. Robinson
91 S.E. 427 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)