Cook v. Murphy

7 G. & J. 282
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedDecember 15, 1835
StatusPublished

This text of 7 G. & J. 282 (Cook v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cook v. Murphy, 7 G. & J. 282 (Md. 1835).

Opinion

Dorsey, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The complainant having submitted his cause to the chancellor for final hearing, has no reason to complain that his bill has been dismissed. It stated no claim to equitable relief, which gave him any standing in a court of chancery. By his own showing his remedy at law was complete, and there he should be left to pursue it. The mere fact of a complainant not availing himself by way of set-off, of a legal claim which he had against a plaintiff obtaining a judgment at law against him, forms of itself no ground for the interference of a court of equity to suspend the execution of such judgment.

DECREE AFFIRMED WITH COSTS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 G. & J. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-murphy-md-1835.