Cook v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

103 N.W. 1097, 125 Wis. 528, 1905 Wisc. LEXIS 151
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided October 3, 1905·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The following opinion was filed June 23, 1905:

MaRShall, J.

After the most careful consideration of the important questions in this case which the members of the court are capable of devoting thereto, they have been unable to agree as to how all of them should be decided which are vital to the judgment. Three members of the court, Justices [532] Winslow, Dodge, and Siebeckee, are in favor of an affirmance of the judgment, while the Chief Justice, Justice Kee-win, and the writer are of the opinion that fatal error was committed in deciding the question of whether the facts found by the jury satisfy the rule in Hadley v. Baxendale, 9 Exch. 341, as adopted by this court in Guetzkow Bros. Co. v. A. H. Andrews & Co. 92 Wis. 214, 66 N. W. 119, and that the judgment should be reversed and one be rendered for the defendant. That situation, under the rule governing such matters, requires an affirmance of the judgment ex necessitate without writing more than this brief statement of the situation.

By the Court. — So ordered.

A motion for a rehearing was denied October 3, 1905.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co., 103 N.W. 1097, 125 Wis. 528, 1905 Wisc. LEXIS 151 (Wis. 1905).

103 N.W. 1097 (Cook v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman
2017 WI 22 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2017)
Hagenah v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.
116 N.W. 843 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1908)