Cook v. Mann

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2010·No. 10-6832·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6832

CHRISTOPHER EUGENE COOK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLES L. MANN, SR.; WILLIS J. FOWLER; ANDREW P. TERRELL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:09-ct-03013-BO)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Eugene Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Oliver Gray Wheeler, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Christopher Eugene Cook appeals the district court’s

orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint

and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Cook v. Mann, No.

5:09-ct-03013-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 29, & June 9, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. Mann, (4th Cir. 2010).

Cook v. Mann (Cook v. Mann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related