Cook v. Korshak

Appellate Court of Illinois

Cook v. Korshak

221 Ill. App. 650

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJune 13, 1921

DocketGen. No. 26,578

StatusPublished

This text of 221 Ill. App. 650 (Cook v. Korshak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cook v. Korshak, 221 Ill. App. 650 (Ill. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dever

delivered the opinion of the court.

Replevin action to recover a diamond taken without authority by plaintiff’s son and pawned with defendant. Action changed to trover on refusal of defendant to give up the diamond. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles F. McKinley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1920. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Dever

delivered the opinion of the court.

Replevin action to recover a diamond taken without authority by plaintiff’s son and pawned with defendant. Action changed to trover on refusal of defendant to give up the diamond. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles F. McKinley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1920. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 Ill. App. 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-korshak-illappct-1921.