Cook v. Knickerbocker
This text of 11 Ind. 230 (Cook v. Knickerbocker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit for partition. Order that partition be made — commissioner appointed to make it — and the cause continued to a subsequent term for the reception of the report of the commissioner. Exception taken, and appeal to this Court. The bill of exceptions states that it con[231]*231tains the substance of the testimony. No motion for a new trial.
This appeal must be dismissed because the order for partition and the appointment of a commissioner do not constitute the final judgment in the cause. They are like the interlocutory judgment upon a demurrer or default, where the damages are to be assessed by a subsequent inquiry. There might be an appeal taken from the action of the Court upon the coming in of the report of the commissioner, thus troubling the Court with two appeals in the same cause, in reaching a single final determination.
We need not notice the other defects which the statement of the case presents.
Per Curiam. — The appeal is dismissed at the cost of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Ind. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-knickerbocker-ind-1858.