Cook v. Kirkman
This text of 207 So. 2d 315 (Cook v. Kirkman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Counsel for the appellees has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for failure of the appellant to comply with Florida Appellate Rules.
From an examination of the record, we find that the appeal should be dismissed for failure to comply with the service provisions of Rule 3.4, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32' F.S.A. However, we have examined the appellant’s brief and the record on appeal and fail to find any error in the record which would warrant a reversal of the order here under review. Therefore, notwithstanding the meritorious motion to dismiss, we affirm the order dismissing and dissolving appellant’s complaint and temporary injunction.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 So. 2d 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-kirkman-fladistctapp-1968.