Cook v. Ivins
133 A. 918, 102 N.J.L. 434, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 186
Opinion
The judgment under review is affirmed by a divided court; seven members of the court voting for an affirmance and an -'qual number voting for a reversal.
*435 For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 7.
For reversal — Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Hetfield, JJ. 7.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cook v. Ivins, 133 A. 918, 102 N.J.L. 434, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 186 (N.J. 1926).
133 A. 918 (Cook v. Ivins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lommason v. the Washington Trust Co.
47 A.2d 323 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)