Cook v. Higgins

71 P. 259, 66 Kan. 762, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 139
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJanuary 10, 1903
DocketNo. 12,863
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 P. 259 (Cook v. Higgins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cook v. Higgins, 71 P. 259, 66 Kan. 762, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 139 (kan 1903).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This was an action of replevin to recover possession of two car-loads of wheat, which were seized by the sheriff while they were in transit. The wheat was attached as the property of J. W. Hawn, but it was claimed by J. M. Higgins. Hawn sold the wheat to the Bank of Blackwell, which in turn sold it to Higgins before it was attached. The main question in the case was the good faith of these transfers. Their validity was upheld by the jury upon what seems to us to be sufficient testimony. So far as the freight charges and the claims of a carrier’s lien are concerned the sheriff did not base his right on such a claim, and on the [763]*763trial he stated that the freight charges had been paid. The seizure of the grain of Higgins on process directed against Hawn was wrongful, and the writ which the sheriff held and served afforded no justification for his tortious act. By reason of this wrongful action he is not in a position to claim a lien, nor can any one be subrogated to a lien through him.

We find nothing substantial in the objections to rulings on evidence, in charging the jury, or upon special findings returned by the jury; nor is there anything in the case requiring extended comment.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yount v. Hoover
149 P. 408 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 P. 259, 66 Kan. 762, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-higgins-kan-1903.