Cook v. Hendrickson
2 N.J.L. 344
Opinion
— -The justice did right; it was too late, after appearance and filing a plea, to take advantage of the defect in the return of the summons.
The second objection to the proceedings of the justice was, that the action was an action of debt; and that the verdict and judgment was for damages. But the [*] court said, that was a mere verbal mistake, for which t they never reversed a judgment — and affirmed the judgment.
Cited in Meeker v. Potter, 2 South. 586; Murat v. Hutchinson, 1 Harr. 46; Steward v. Sears, 7 Vr. 175; McQuade v. Emmons, 9 Vr. 400.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cook v. Hendrickson, 2 N.J.L. 344 (N.J. 1808).
2 N.J.L. 344 (Cook v. Hendrickson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.