Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cook v. Florida Parole Commission

Cook v. Florida Parole Commission

73 So. 3d 296, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14657, 2011 WL 4104991
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 16, 2011
DocketNo. 1D11-1520
StatusPublished

This text of 73 So. 3d 296 (Cook v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cook v. Florida Parole Commission, 73 So. 3d 296, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14657, 2011 WL 4104991 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Cook seeks review of a circuit court order denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We treat his notice of appeal as a petition for second-tier certiorari review, see Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(c), and we deny the petition because Mr. Cook has not demonstrated entitlement to relief. See generally Sheley v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998).

DENIED.

PADOVANO, ROBERTS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheley v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N
703 So. 2d 1202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Sheley v. Florida Parole Com'n
720 So. 2d 216 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 So. 3d 296, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14657, 2011 WL 4104991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-2011.